Your post was removed for the following reason(s):
Your title did not include at least two ages/genders or was not formatted correctly
Posts must:
include details about the involved parties including ages, genders, and length of relationship, and
request advice in real situations involving two or more people
We are enforcing the two rules listed above by making all titles start with ages/genders in the following format:
[##X][##X], [## X][## X], or [##-X][##-X] where ## is the age and X is the gender (currently M, F, T, A, NB, FTM, MTF but more can be added). You can have more than two ages/genders listed, but you must have at least two at the beginning of your title. Here is an example:
..I’m not saying it doesn’t. However, if my partner does not have a job and can’t support themselves unless they are doing something that is directly hurting them, or completely wild then I wouldn’t care.
The whole point of going to work is to be able to pay your bills, to online, and to pursue your hobbies and passions.
OP has a trust fund that allows her to do what she wants, so I find it wild at everyone’s ignoring the fact that his reasoning is simply that it’s unfair. Unfair to him.
How is her not having to work unfair? And how to something being unfair lead to OP being characterized as lazy? And so unfair that he has decided that she needs to get a job to be valuable in his eyes in a specific way, that is unfair and unreasonable.
Yeah he is cordial to me, and i know his opinion isnt important about me. Im just surprised he thinks he can talk about my decisions behind my back like that.
And from his family’s history with marriages, divorces, i would never talk bad about how he chose his women either.
I thought about it more, and it seems the case yhay you're looking to keep connections with the ex because you have romantic feelings for him. The dog and jewelry that you can't bring yourself to be rid of or big tells.
Even if she wasn’t playing a game, and she was just doing whatever in the house, you are STILL allowed to call someone else first, for ANY reason.
Eg maybe you want to get the calls out of the way so you can relax after, or you told someone you’d tell them asap, or maybe someone needs that info to do something further for you, or maybe you need to thank someone.
You’re allowed to call who you want, when you want.
This in no way actually affects her or has anything to do with her. She needs to get over herself and ideally she goes in the bin.
Hello /u/sincerebanana,
Your post was removed for the following reason(s):
Your title did not include at least two ages/genders or was not formatted correctly
Posts must:
include details about the involved parties including ages, genders, and length of relationship, and
request advice in real situations involving two or more people
We are enforcing the two rules listed above by making all titles start with ages/genders in the following format:
[##X][##X], [## X][## X], or [##-X][##-X] where ## is the age and X is the gender (currently M, F, T, A, NB, FTM, MTF but more can be added). You can have more than two ages/genders listed, but you must have at least two at the beginning of your title. Here is an example:
[34NB][88-F] We are two people in an example post
Please resubmit with a corrected title.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
..I’m not saying it doesn’t. However, if my partner does not have a job and can’t support themselves unless they are doing something that is directly hurting them, or completely wild then I wouldn’t care.
The whole point of going to work is to be able to pay your bills, to online, and to pursue your hobbies and passions.
OP has a trust fund that allows her to do what she wants, so I find it wild at everyone’s ignoring the fact that his reasoning is simply that it’s unfair. Unfair to him.
How is her not having to work unfair? And how to something being unfair lead to OP being characterized as lazy? And so unfair that he has decided that she needs to get a job to be valuable in his eyes in a specific way, that is unfair and unreasonable.
Really funny how you said you can’t be without her yet you can’t keep your little sausage in your pants.
screw her; thats your dad!!!!!
So end it. Check out Daniel Sloss.
Yeah he is cordial to me, and i know his opinion isnt important about me. Im just surprised he thinks he can talk about my decisions behind my back like that.
And from his family’s history with marriages, divorces, i would never talk bad about how he chose his women either.
I thought about it more, and it seems the case yhay you're looking to keep connections with the ex because you have romantic feelings for him. The dog and jewelry that you can't bring yourself to be rid of or big tells.
This is ridiculous.
Even if she wasn’t playing a game, and she was just doing whatever in the house, you are STILL allowed to call someone else first, for ANY reason.
Eg maybe you want to get the calls out of the way so you can relax after, or you told someone you’d tell them asap, or maybe someone needs that info to do something further for you, or maybe you need to thank someone.
You’re allowed to call who you want, when you want.
This in no way actually affects her or has anything to do with her. She needs to get over herself and ideally she goes in the bin.