![](/cs/camsoda2500.jpg")
0 views
Press right there to start video or
Room for live! sex video chat leo_lilly
Model from:
Languages: en
Birth Date: 2004-01-14
Body Type: bodyTypeCurvy
Ethnicity: ethnicityWhite
Hair color: hairColorRed
Eyes color: eyeColorBlue
Subculture: subcultureStudent
Date: October 12, 2022
they think a lot of customers are undercover because THEY ARE.
What do you want to know? You don't have any attraction for her BUT,SHE'S THE BEST!!! You love her and her butt but sex with her now sucks. Leave her and walk away, or be man enough and tell her ALL this. Tell her so that she can go find someone who will love having sex with her and be all over and in her! She deserves that and you can no longer do that. Set her free and walk away if you CAN'T do this, then you are a coward and a pos , sorry my opinion and probably not helpful and nada, again
If your girlfriend spoke french, wouldn't you want to learn it so you could communicate more effectively?
It does sound like she likes you, but maybe it isn't romantic? Some people fall nude for friends in a platonic way. Personally, as a neurodivergent person, I've gotten platonic hyperfixations on people that really resemble romantics crushes; being around them makes me happy so I seek their company and interact with them what is prolly seen in an unusual manner.
Not saying that's the case for your friend, but it's a possibility. She might romantically like you, but there's also a chance that it's platonic and she's just an atypical person.
So it's one thing for him to express insecurity and recognize as his own, and entirely other thing to put it on you as you doing something wrong (in a mysogynistic and sex negative way too)
Presumelably, you two dated a while before sleeping with each (because you were each's first). So him having insecurity over your desire for him (relative to other men) is understandable (though not rational, insecurity tends to ignore key context).
But for this to be resolved in a healthy way it would require him to recognize and own his insecurity, whereas from your post it sounds as if he is trying to play the victim to control you.
Another factor to this is the nature of your breakup. If he broke up with you, his words & actions here reflect worse on his character (and points to him being controlling). If you broke up with him, insecurity on his side becomes more understandable. Also if the reasons why you broke up havent been resolved, it's pretty rare that it'll go any better the 2nd time around.
I think his routine has been like this all his life. I don’t think he was educated on the importance of self care and hygiene. That’s why he’s so used to being this way. I have taken him through my routine and has put them in his own which makes me happy, but he just doesn’t do it enough. I had a long talk with him and I hope it works out(it’s in the chat if you’d like to read, it’s lenghty). I thank you (:
Toys!! There are strap-ons he can use and give you what you need!
Also, maybe yall could open up your relationship so you can be satisfied sexually. however, this one might require couples therapy and lots of discussions to make that even remotely possible. The biggest issue is that as a man, he may feel inadequate with you going elsewhere or even using toys. Make sure that if he gets defensive about talking about these things that you are patient and understanding. Try to make sure you use your “I” statements, and don't put any of it on him. You aren't trying to tell him he is falling short because there isn't much he can do but you need to find a solution that makes you happy!!
If you love him and he loves you, there is a way!
so I can have a big hand in raising them during the formative years. Early childhood is so important and I know that if I was a parent I would want to be as involved as possible.
This is the bit that jumped out at me. Now maybe BF had no issue with this. But contrast OP “claiming” the right to be as involved as possible with any children, with BFs:
Then he accused me of sneakily trying to force him into making me a stay-at-home wife (??????) while he busts ass at work.
Which…yeah. OP is quite literally setting up a scenario where she spends all the important formative years with their kids, while her partner doesn't because they're responsible for all the monies.
I would not have been comfortable with any arrangement with my wife that sidelined me to “breadwinner” while leaving her as “involved parent”.
He's getting a lot of hate here, but in OPs own words, the only specific issue he brought up about her rules (beyond having them) was the bit where she spends all her time with the children and he's responsible for funding it all by himself.